<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:05:59 -0700<BR>> From: dmolnar@eecs.berkeley.edu<BR>> To: board@lists.noisebridge.net<BR>> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-board] FW: [Fwd: QUESTION Re: 4. Name and job description and qualifications of key personnel]<BR>> <BR>> Andy Isaacson wrote:<BR>> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:31:15PM -0700, Mitch Altman wrote:<BR>> >> Thanks, David.<BR>> >> <BR>> >> Can others please email me the hours they think go with their<BR>> >> position? I'll compile and email to Carol.<BR>> > <BR>> > I suppose I should probably have a title of some kind beyond "board<BR>> > member", since I've spent a solid 30 hours or more per week at 83c<BR>> > through October. (Not all of it working on Noisebridge stuff of course,<BR>> > but much of it.) But man do I hate titles and the political games that<BR>> > go with them.<BR>> <BR>> for our internal runnings, not sure we need titles. especially if you<BR>> don't want them. Just "Member" should work, plus things like "build team<BR>> coordinator guy" as appropriate. (Thanks again, by the way, for all your<BR>> hard work on that and other things so far!)<BR>> <BR>> So far,the titles only matter for things like interacting with banks,<BR>> insurance companies, etc. There it matters when people ask for things<BR>> like "please have the Exec. Director and the Secretary sign this paper."<BR>> In those cases they are a necessary evil, but I don't think we have any<BR>> pressing need to do more of them.<BR><BR>
Yeah -- thanks Andy for your great work over the last month!<BR>
<BR>
All this beaurocracy is a bummer, isn't it? But we are on our way to that 501(c)(3) which we've been working at for so long. All I really need to do is send Carol 1 number for each of us. I got your number, and David's -- now if I could get that number from 3 other people...<BR>
<BR>
Mitch.<BR>
<BR></body>
</html>