<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I'm also cool with either date. And the format you suggest sounds really good.<br><br>Mitch.<br><br><br>-----------------<br>> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:18:56 -0700<br>> From: rachel@xtreme.com<br>> To: dmolnar@eecs.berkeley.edu<br>> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Processing workshop scheduling<br>> CC: noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net<br>> <br>> David Molnar wrote:<br>> > Scott Murray wrote:<br>> >> Hi, all,<br>> >><br>> >> I won't be able to attend tomorrow's meeting, but would like to run <br>> >> two things past the group.<br>> >><br>> >> First, I'd like to pick a day for the Processing workshop. I'd like <br>> >> to propose either 9/13 or 9/20. Do people have a preference?<br>> > <br>> > Either date is fine with me.<br>> <br>> Ditto<br>> > <br>> > <br>> >> Second, I'd like to propose a format. I think an all-day session <br>> >> would be too long, but 2-3 hours is reasonable. But I'd love to spend <br>> >> more time with people who get into it, so what about this: Let's <br>> >> schedule 2 hours as direct teaching, followed by a break, and 2 hours <br>> >> of open workshop time for people who can/want to stick around and work <br>> >> on their projects. I would stick around and could give more <br>> >> individual attention during the second half. How do people feel about <br>> >> this approach?<br>> > <br>> > The format sounds great. Two hours is about the limit for me for sitting <br>> > and working on anything.<br>> <br>> Ditto<br>> <br>> > <br>> > -David Molnar<br>> > <br>> <br>> Rachel AKA Broken Record<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>> Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net<br>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss<br></body>
</html>