<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><div><div><div>My vote for a passive security system is to discourage Dalvador Dali Lama v.2 from emptying the place and taking it to the pawn shop across the street for crack money at 3:30 AM when they notice nobody is there to stop them. My concern is that our unwanteds problem has only really been increasing never decreasing and the infractions have been getting slowly worse. I personally will welcome a slightly elevated screening process and better Locks as an alternative to not having anything. I don’t see how having a more active lock system, and maybe putting a webcam at the buzzer for seeing who is at the door is creating rules. The way I see it is noisebridge encourages maturity and a mature crowd and some people will just not have the maturity to respect the space call me an elitist but some people do not have that maturity and any efforts to keep them out shouldn't be looked at as hurting our image only enhancing it for the good of getting projects done.</div><div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; "><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Carl Sue</div><div>Carl@carlsue.com</div><div><br></div></div></span><div><span class="body"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Garamond Premier Pro" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; ">"Why join the navy if you can be a pirate"?</span></font></span></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Garamond Premier Pro" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; "> <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></span></font></span><i><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Garamond Premier Pro" size="4"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; ">-Steve Jobs</span></font></i></div></div></div></div></div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> <<a href="mailto:girlgeek@wt.net">girlgeek@wt.net</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:17:52 -0700<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> Jonathan Lassoff <<a href="mailto:jof@thejof.com">jof@thejof.com</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span> <<a href="mailto:noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a>>, <<a href="mailto:adi@hexapodia.org">adi@hexapodia.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] call for action - Mr. Salvador/Salvator Dalajlama is back<br></div><div><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-size:10pt;">Just to add my 2 cents.<br><br>Mr. Salvador Dalai Lama will get in what ever security system we put in place, and security systems are a pain, and many expensive. Unfortunate souls are a problem that will recur from time to time. But I vote for chasing the problem individuals out rather than changing the way Noisebridge works. It takes more personal assertiveness. To use a political more or less parallel - my recommendation is to go more in the direction of chasing down Bin Laden, and less in the direction of going to war with 2 countries because of him. If a whole bunch of Salvador equivalents start showing up with regularity, then I change my mind. As long as it is just him - throw him out. I also am less opposed to calling the cops than most of the rest of Noisebridge is. <br><br>As I say, my 2 cents.<br><br>- Claudia<br><br><br>--- <a href="mailto:jof@thejof.com">jof@thejof.com</a> wrote:<br><br>From: Jonathan Lassoff <<a href="mailto:jof@thejof.com">jof@thejof.com</a>><br>To: Andy Isaacson <<a href="mailto:adi@hexapodia.org">adi@hexapodia.org</a>><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] call for action - Mr. Salvador/Salvator Dalajlama is back<br>Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:35:17 -0700<br><br><p>A "hasp"! That's the word I was looking for.<br>
Something that latches it shut so it can't be opened from the outside is all I was thinking.</p><p>Cheers,<br>
jof</p><p></p><blockquote>On Oct 30, 2010 4:21 PM, "Andy Isaacson" <<a href="mailto:adi@hexapodia.org">adi@hexapodia.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></blockquote><p></p><p><font color="#500050">On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:08:27PM -0700, meredith scheff wrote:<br>
> Keep the patio door locked. As fo...</font></p>The roof hatch already has two hasps for locks. It'd be super annoying<br>
to have a real padlock there, but a couple of carabiners should do the<br>
trick.<br><font color="#888888"><br>
-andy<br></font><p><font color="#500050">_______________________________________________<br>Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>Noisebridge-discuss...</font></p><p></p>
_______________________________________________
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
<a href="/eonapps/ft/wm/page/compose?send_to=Noisebridge-discuss%40lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a></div>_______________________________________________
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
<a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a>
<a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a>
</span></body></html>