<p>I think that noisebridge would present an easy target for the government if we hosted a mirror. I also feel that wikileaks is already mirrored across many other places that are much harder to attack in that way - they will be fine without us mirroring them.</p>
<p>The value that noisebridge provides by continuing to exist makes it not worth the risk.</p>
<p>I had some other concerns that were resolved privately, </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 8, 2010 10:40 AM, "Rachel McConnell" <<a href="mailto:rachel@xtreme.com">rachel@xtreme.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> Can you specify your objection so it can be discussed? Simply stating<br>
> intention to block doesn't forward the creation of a compromise, which<br>> is the real goal of consensus decision making.<br>> <br>> Rachel<br>> <br>> Ryan Castellucci wrote:<br>>> As a current member in good standing, I'm blocking consensus regarding<br>
>> Noisebridge sponsoring a WikiLeaks mirror. It's difficult for me to<br>>> attend the Tuesday meetings, so I request someone bring up my<br>>> objection if it's discussed.<br>>> <br>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Albert Sweigart <<a href="mailto:asweigart@gmail.com">asweigart@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> How about we put it to a vote?<br>>> <br></div>