I agree that NB shouldn't host an extremely controversial website that's under attack by multiple nations. I'm not opposed, however, to NB teaching about or being in favor of site! NB is just one or two or three hosts, whereas NB members provide the real power of numbers.<br>
<br> Teach a person to fish...<br><br>My opinion is that Noisebridge should, as an legal organization, be politically anti partisan in regards to WL. NB is our haven and our hub, and it's best not to draw any attention to it when the real impact can be made without holding NB responsible.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Ryan Castellucci <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ryan.castellucci@gmail.com">ryan.castellucci@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<p>Android's gmail client needs a confirm for the send function</p>
<p>... I had some other concerns that were resolved privately, so I'll back down from blocking, but I still think we shouldn't do it.</p><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 8, 2010 11:12 AM, "Ryan Castellucci" <<a href="mailto:ryan.castellucci@gmail.com" target="_blank">ryan.castellucci@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> I think that noisebridge would present an easy target for the government if<br>
> we hosted a mirror. I also feel that wikileaks is already mirrored across<br>> many other places that are much harder to attack in that way - they will be<br>> fine without us mirroring them.<br>> <br>> The value that noisebridge provides by continuing to exist makes it not<br>
> worth the risk.<br>> <br>> I had some other concerns that were resolved privately,<br>> On Dec 8, 2010 10:40 AM, "Rachel McConnell" <<a href="mailto:rachel@xtreme.com" target="_blank">rachel@xtreme.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Can you specify your objection so it can be discussed? Simply stating<br>>> intention to block doesn't forward the creation of a compromise, which<br>>> is the real goal of consensus decision making.<br>
>><br>>> Rachel<br>>><br>>> Ryan Castellucci wrote:<br>>>> As a current member in good standing, I'm blocking consensus regarding<br>>>> Noisebridge sponsoring a WikiLeaks mirror. It's difficult for me to<br>
>>> attend the Tuesday meetings, so I request someone bring up my<br>>>> objection if it's discussed.<br>>>><br>>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Albert Sweigart <<a href="mailto:asweigart@gmail.com" target="_blank">asweigart@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>>>>> How about we put it to a vote?<br>>>><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>