<p>I don't believe living situation should come into it at all. I make over 100k/year, have been software, hardware, and life hacking since I was 8 (that is more than 30 years). I have been homeless in the past, and currently live in an sro. I think the truly important measure here is ability/willingness to hack. </p>
<p>--Christopher<br></p>
<p>On Feb 10, 2012 4:05 PM, "rachel lyra hospodar" <<a href="mailto:rachelyra@gmail.com">rachelyra@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Right, and I am decidedly /not/ a big guy. Imagine me trying to have<br>
> > that conversation, but on the street outside the gate. I don't think it<br>
> > would have gone well.<br>
><br>
> I've done this, at 3am. someone sort of followed me there from a party<br>
> (incidentally one where they had to eject one of our homeless residents<br>
> for drunkenness). I'm a smallish female, although i usually wear baggy<br>
> clothes and boots. It wasn't fun but it worked out ok. I'm pretty<br>
> assertive though.<br>
><br>
> Since our constituency of preferred users includes many people who would<br>
> be uncomfortable with this type of confrontation, we probably want to<br>
> help deal with that! I think that the more complicated it looks to get<br>
> in, the easier it would be to tell a person trying to follow you in that<br>
> they are not authorized for entry. By creating a ridiculous rube<br>
> goldberg of Entry we can create a Flying Spaghetti Monster type<br>
> authority to appeal to when denying someone entry. THE SCIENCE-DEITIES<br>
> OF ENTRY DENY YOU! I AM BUT THEIR HUMBLE SERVANT!<br>
><br>
> R.<br>
><br>
> On 2/10/2012 2:34 PM, David Estes wrote:<br>
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Shannon Lee <<a href="mailto:shannon@scatter.com">shannon@scatter.com</a><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:shannon@scatter.com">shannon@scatter.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > I'm a big guy, I speak in an authoritative tone, and he was<br>
> > extremely deferential in exactly the way you'd expect from someone<br>
> > meek unexpectedly encountering an authority figure, and I still<br>
> > found the whole thing extremely awkward. Even though there wasn't<br>
> > any "unpleasantness," in the sense that nobody yelled or was<br>
> > confrontational, it was still extremely socially awkward, put me in<br>
> > a position of uncomfortable power distance, and was also very time<br>
> > consuming -- I think it was a ten or fifteen minute conversation.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Right, and I am decidedly /not/ a big guy. Imagine me trying to have<br>
> > that conversation, but on the street outside the gate. I don't think it<br>
> > would have gone well.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
> > <a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
</p>