I found a recent article talking about changes to safe search, but it doesn't seem to corroborate the thread title.<div><a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-safesearch-filter-in-image-search-142330">http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-safesearch-filter-in-image-search-142330</a><br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Martin Bogomolni <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martinbogo@gmail.com" target="_blank">martinbogo@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">James, what is your source information on this?<br>
<br>
I also just did a search, with SafeSearch off, and indeed there was<br>
pr0n in the results.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-M<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>