#no one beats heisenburg's (walter white) quality...<br><br>end comments<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:23 PM, jim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jim@systemateka.com" target="_blank">jim@systemateka.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Your labeled lockbox is a good idea.<br>
Is it good meth?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 20:18 -0800, John Withers wrote:<br>
> On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 18:41 -0800, jim wrote:<br>
> > Your take on my words is different from<br>
> > my intent. Your labeled lockbox idea is a<br>
> > good solution. Your reference to a sekert<br>
> > klub strikes me as over-the-top per my<br>
> > intent.<br>
> > And I didn't want to suggest hiding all<br>
> > sharp or dangerous objects. Just a few that<br>
> > are both "exotic" and "dangerous", which is<br>
> > to say, things that require some training<br>
> > and can cause serious damage, like converting<br>
> > flesh to mush.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Yeah, it was over the top and I didn't mean to be insulting. But I still<br>
> have an issue with doing this with *any* tools unless there is some kind<br>
> of large sign that says "We have X. You can't have it unless you talk to<br>
> Y." Otherwise it is impossible to know what is available for use, what<br>
> we just don't have, and what has been converted to meth.<br>
><br>
> j<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>