<div dir="ltr"><a href="http://i.imgur.com/hePQTrE.jpg">http://i.imgur.com/hePQTrE.jpg</a><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jof@thejof.com" target="_blank">jof@thejof.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:06 PM, nicolas weidinger<br>
<<a href="mailto:dr.weidinger@gmail.com">dr.weidinger@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> what do you mean this wont work!?<br>
<br>
</div>Oh, I don't mean to say that wont work at all. I'm a big proponent of<br>
Gigabit applications!<br>
<br>
I just think about how to _prevent_ crashing browsers most of the<br>
time, so my ears perked up reading the "crash the browser" part.<br>
<br>
<br>
How about very nice full-screen HD videos of adorable kittens, and<br>
never serve them at slower speeds, or intentionally add jitter and<br>
delay if the streams are too slow.<br>
Denying viewers adorable kittens unless they have gigabit Ethernet.<br>
People will be out in the street with torches, demanding fiber, I tell you!<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>