<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000066">
On 6/26/2013 6:57 PM, Naomi Most wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPKWcozPHtrv5PWu3WrYF=_hnm7XMsYkVR2YqDTwB1hr563rtg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">(1) Would you have everything be completely locked up in lockers? Everything? </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
No, I never said "everything". I think lockers are needed for
personal ongoing projects. Currently, the Noise Orchestra hackers
have to hide their electronics projects in the shelves, and hope
they don't get smashed or rehacked. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPKWcozPHtrv5PWu3WrYF=_hnm7XMsYkVR2YqDTwB1hr563rtg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">My comment -- and another you took issue with -- was meant to inspire thinking about how "nice things" could be protected in one way by having the people installing them thinking of how to increase the difficulty of ability to mess with those "nice things".</pre>
</blockquote>
I support that. Your meaning was lost in translation.
<pre wrap="">(2) Do you believe it is actually *possible* to achieve a state of total non-theft? </pre>
<br>
No, I never said "total". We should do what we can. Thanks to Alex
Buie and others for their work on RFID tags. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPKWcozPHtrv5PWu3WrYF=_hnm7XMsYkVR2YqDTwB1hr563rtg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">(3) Have you stopped beating your wife yet, Jonny?</pre>
</blockquote>
this is just a plain abusive, attack on my reputation, undeserved,
and completely off-topic. I believe your tactic is to "shut me up"
by attacking me personally. <br>
<br>
Naomi, i'd like to invite you to attend the next Noisebridge
meeting, next Tuesday July 2, at about 8pm. Your comment here will
be on the agenda. I feel this should not be acceptable communication
on the list, or in the space. <br>
<br>
I will reschedule my trip to see my parents in LA, to attend this
meeting. <br>
</body>
</html>