<html><head></head><body>I have an ssd that we can use.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Jake <jake@spaz.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">I see a reboot in the log, along with some ATA/disk errors:<br />...<br />Then, no disk errors and another reboot around Jul 2 23:16:05<br /><br />Originally, this box didn't have a SATA drive, it was just a solid<br />state 2GB CF card with noatime and a mostly read-only FS.<br />I'd love to get this back into a state like that, where there are no<br />moving parts.</blockquote><br />i don't think we should reduce functionality because a hard disk wore out.<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">For now, we ought to suck down the important parts of the disk, and<br />swap out a new disk in there. :(</blockquote><br />i agree! new disk! brand new disk!<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">I think it's just a laptop-sized SATA drive in a little enclosure,<br />that goes to a SATA cord to the motherboard.<br />Anyone have an SSD to spare?</blockquote><br />i think SSD might be a bad idea, don't they just suddenly croak with no <br />way to recover anything? I prefer what we have now - a chance to recover <br />our data.<br /><br />-jake<br /><hr /><br />Rack mailing list<br />Rack@lists.noisebridge.net<br /><a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/rack">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/rack</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>