<p>Id prefer to replace the kitchen with a bio lab that would include GMO tests. That's some good food hacking you don't get to do everyday.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 26, 2013 4:30 PM, "Johny Radio" <<a href="mailto:johnyradio@gmail.com">johnyradio@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000066">
    On 7/26/2013 2:29 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
    <blockquote type="cite">Assuming "food hackers" can design a kitchen is like
      asking a chef to design a kitchen. </blockquote>
    <br>
    excellent points, Adrian. my point was that food hackers should be
    consulted in defining the purpose and usage of the kitchen-- not
    necessarily design or build it. <br>
    <br>
    That said, i totally support pulling out the existing facility,
    since it's clear that it is facilitating non-hacking use, not
    taste-bridge. <br>
    <br>
    <div><font size="+1">Johny Radio<br>
        <img alt="" src="http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/robodread/robodread1201/robodread120100030/11882514-ear-and-sound-waves.jpg" width="150"><br>
        Stick It In Your Ear!<br>
      </font> <br>
    </div>
  </div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>