<html><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head><body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">My understanding of the 
proposal is to re-evaluate Associate Membership in February, so no 
definition of what happens if we get rid of them has been provided.<br>
<br>
I think having consensus on new members is pretty overzealous. Some 
combination of the two processes might be better (4 week trial period, 
written statement on the wiki, and 4 sponsors seems appropriate to me).<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Madelynn<br>
<br>
<blockquote style="border: 0px none;" 
cite="mid:CAPyZGS=NA3Tnt37NZR8Revj=PN4u60npR6gY6xX=uTc35e_uuQ@mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  <div style="margin:30px 25px 10px 25px;" class="__pbConvHr"><div 
style="display:table;width:100%;border-top:1px solid 
#EDEEF0;padding-top:5px">       <div 
style="display:table-cell;vertical-align:middle;padding-right:6px;"><img
 photoaddress="asweigart@gmail.com" photoname="Al Sweigart" 
src="cid:part1.03060801.08070900@gmail.com" name="postbox-contact.jpg" 
width="25px" height="25px"></div>   <div 
style="display:table-cell;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:middle;width:100%">
        <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:asweigart@gmail.com" 
style="color:#737F92 
!important;padding-right:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none 
!important;">Al Sweigart</a></div>   <div 
style="display:table-cell;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:middle;">   
  <font color="#9FA2A5"><span style="padding-left:6px">December 10, 2013
 5:12 PM</span></font></div></div></div>
  <div style="color:#888888;margin-left:24px;margin-right:24px;" 
__pbrmquotes="true" class="__pbConvBody"><div dir="ltr">Just to clarify,
 this would get rid of the concept of associate members? And would not 
convert them to being members? Would they still (technically) be able to
 come to Noisebridge on their own?<div><br></div>


<div>Am I right in saying that basically the idea of having associate 
members was to 1) make it easy to become an associate member since no 
single person could block it (rather, you'd have to have a unanimous 
vote to block someone) and 2) on the other side, associate members 
couldn't unilaterally block consensus items?</div>


<div><br></div><div>It did always feel like a hack to me. I'd rather 
just have the regular members all become associate members since 
blocking is such a nuclear option, causing people to circumvent the 
consensus process entirely (which leads to drama).</div>

<div><br></div><div>-Al</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><br></div></div>

  </div>
  <div style="margin:30px 25px 10px 25px;" class="__pbConvHr"><div 
style="display:table;width:100%;border-top:1px solid 
#EDEEF0;padding-top:5px">       <div 
style="display:table-cell;vertical-align:middle;padding-right:6px;"><img
 photoaddress="bfb@riseup.net" photoname="Kevin Schiesser" 
src="cid:part2.09040703.04000703@gmail.com" name="postbox-contact.jpg" 
width="25px" height="25px"></div>   <div 
style="display:table-cell;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:middle;width:100%">
        <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:bfb@riseup.net" 
style="color:#737F92 
!important;padding-right:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none 
!important;">Kevin Schiesser</a></div>   <div 
style="display:table-cell;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:middle;">   
  <font color="#9FA2A5"><span style="padding-left:6px">December 10, 2013
 8:48 AM</span></font></div></div></div>
  <div style="color:#888888;margin-left:24px;margin-right:24px;" 
__pbrmquotes="true" class="__pbConvBody">
  

    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" 
http-equiv="content-type">
  
    Text:<br>
    "Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days,
    beginning October 29, 2013, to the consensus decision <a 
moz-do-not-send="true" title="Meeting Notes 2013 10 29" 
href="https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2013_10_29#Proposal_to_create_an_Associate_Member_role_and_limit_access_to_Noisebridge_24.2F7_to_Member.2C_Associate_Member_and_thoes_hosted_by_M_and_AM">to
 create an Associate Member
      role</a>. All subsequent mutations of the original consensus
    should be brought for a second consensus, beginning February 4,
    2014.
    "<br>
    <br>
    See <a moz-do-not-send="true" 
href="https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items" 
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items</a>
 for
    details.<br>
    <br>
    Thanks,<br>
    Kevin<br>
  <div>_______________________________________________<br>Noisebridge-discuss
 mailing list<br><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br></div></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br><span><span><div><small><font 
color="#000000"><big>Madelynn Martiniere<br>

Community Engineer. Entrepreneur. Geek.</big><big><br>
      </big></font></small></div><div><font color="#000000"><a 
href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/madelynnmartiniere" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a> </font>| <a
 style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" 
href="http://www.twitter.com/creativetaboo" target="_blank">Twitter </a>|
 <a href="mailto:madelynn@women2.com" target="_blank">Email</a></div><big>
  </big><div><font color="#000000"><br></font></div></span> </span></div>
</body></html>