<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/20/2013 04:15 PM, J.C. wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAHxkbY1idpJ_fq8PVonjB8jPOuNstCdk0Biiw81k1vTc4o-gEg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div>So what if you combined that with a "mesh" aspect, and you
        could create pocket stations around the city</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Seems like it would make for a fun kit as well, building mini
        fm transmitters & receivers.</div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I've been thinking about this as well. Folks have been working on
    WiFi based mesh networks for over a decade, and while the technology
    is cheap and you can use off-the-shelf components, range is limited
    unless you use external antennas, maybe directional ones. But the
    main showstopper is the line-of-sight requirement for larger
    distances.<br>
    <br>
    I see Norman's point that you shouldn't upset the FCC, so maybe some
    proactive screening of relevant regulations and maybe even getting
    in touch with them before deployment couldn't harm.<br>
    <br>
    Sparkfun has some ideas for transceivers in the ISM bands around
    434, 868 and 915 MHz:<br>
    <br>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <a href="https://www.sparkfun.com/categories/16">https://www.sparkfun.com/categories/16</a><br>
    <br>
    in particular this one looks interesting:<br>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11664">https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11664</a><br>
    <br>
    You don't want to stream stuff in HD, do you? ;)<br>
    <br>
    I would be interested in a low-cost module that works down on HF
    frequencies, and even though projects like the HackRF [1] reach down
    to that range, they're still too expensive for mass deployment.<br>
    <br>
    These modules here are not open hardware, but they come closer to
    the price range I have in mind:<br>
    <br>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <a
href="http://www.radiometrix.com/our-products/latest+products/Transceivers">http://www.radiometrix.com/our-products/latest+products/Transceivers</a><br>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <a
href="http://www.kiatronics.com/rf-27mhz-fm-series-transmitters-and-receivers/fmt-2712-1-watt-27mhz-radio-data-module.html">http://www.kiatronics.com/rf-27mhz-fm-series-transmitters-and-receivers/fmt-2712-1-watt-27mhz-radio-data-module.html</a><br>
    <br>
    It cannot be *that* hard to develop a transceiver for 27 MHz ... but
    piggybacking digital data on FM sound like a silly idea. I would
    have to read up on the regulations if anything else is allowed tho
    ...
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <a href="http://dronepedia.com/index.php?title=Radio_bands">http://dronepedia.com/index.php?title=Radio_bands</a>
    has a nice overview of ISM bands.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Cheers<br>
    <br>
    Alex<br>
    <br>
    [1]
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <a
href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mossmann/hackrf-an-open-source-sdr-platform">http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mossmann/hackrf-an-open-source-sdr-platform</a><br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
"Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one."
    -- Benjamin Franklin</pre>
  </body>
</html>