<div dir="ltr">2014/1/6 Praveen Sinha <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmhomee@gmail.com" target="_blank">dmhomee@gmail.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div>-- <i>Voting is still to frigging blunt</i></div><div>There a number of ways to try to patch the consensus process without totally removing it.  Examples would include:  ...increasing number of blocks required to block block...</div>
</div></blockquote><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Yet, a solution must be found. I like block blocking and block block blocking.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">* First block takes one blocker.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">
* Blocking the block takes two.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">* Blocking the block of the block takes three...or four?<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">* Blocking the block of the block takes four...or eight?<br>
<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Exponential, linear...something else? What should it be? Does block-blocking ultimately become voting? It has nice quality of struggle to it, just the same.<br><br>  Block!<br>  Well, we block your block!<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote">  And we block your block block!<br>  Blocking that block block block!<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Feel the emotion.<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">
<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Perhaps there is a devilish way to game such a system. Assume there are an odd number of potential blockers...<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br clear="all"><div>--<br>Jason Dusek<br>
pgp // solidsnack // C1EBC57DC55144F35460C8DF1FD4C6C1FED18A2B</div>
<br></div></div></div>