<p dir="ltr">Now for the juicy response. Mitch, you of all people know how the consensus process works. It is on the wiki and explained at every meeting. It works so that someone makes a consensus item before one Tuesday meeting. This first meeting and the time to the next meeting is to make everyone aware of said consensus item. This allows us to include everyone pretty much always. It allows council members to proxy block or whatever the case may be. It also allows people involved time to plan to attend a meeting so that perhaps they can defend themselves. The banning of Lee was on there for way more than two weeks. Lee knew of the proposal. Naomi should have known about It and perhaps blocked or made a request before consensus was reached. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Lee is currently unwelcome at noisebridge in its entirety. If Lee wishes to change this he should follow noisebridge procedure and create a new consensus item to reverse the other one. If he doesn't do that, the ban is even more legitimate since he is refusing to abide by our rules and bylaws. </p>
<p dir="ltr">I need all of you who are encouraging Lee to come to the meeting to tell him not too. He would be tresspassing. It is 100% your fault for not being involved enough to either proxy block or make a request for more discussion. Please respect consensus and be excellent.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 25, 2014 5:53 PM, "Ronald Cotoni" <<a href="mailto:setient@gmail.com">setient@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">Come to a meeting. Read the bylaws and look at the wiki. These questions can be answered by those things</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 25, 2014 5:47 PM, "Charles Tang" <<a href="mailto:cjtang1@asu.edu" target="_blank">cjtang1@asu.edu</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span>Is active member defined be the label "member" or is it define by those who are "active."<div><br></div>
<div>Or is there really a mythical "active member"</div></span><div>—<br>Sent from <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox" target="_blank">Mailbox</a> for iPhone</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><p>On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Adrian Chadd <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:adrian.chadd@gmail.com" target="_blank">adrian.chadd@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></p><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p>On 25 February 2014 17:42, Darius Garza <<a href="mailto:313kid@gmail.com" target="_blank">313kid@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
<br>> "A ban from the Noisebridge space may be a useful social punishment for a
<br>> social crime"
<br>>
<br>> Noisebridge is a lot of things, but it certainly isn't up to anyone to use
<br>> it as a "social punishment" tool.
<br><br>... noisebridge is apparently whatever the active membership decide it
<br>is. I thought that was the point.
<br><br><br>-a
<br>_______________________________________________
<br>Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net" target="_blank">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a>
<br><a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a>
<br></p></blockquote></div><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net" target="_blank">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>