<p dir="ltr">I'm terribly sorry about your disconnected equipment. But we were in a hurry to get the WiFi up and running. As I stated before, the reason this started was due to the network NOT WORKING. If something isn't broken, it shouldn't be fixed.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Does it ever occur to you that some people might have legitimate reasons for doing something? Accidents do happen, and equipment malfunctions all the time. In any case, Networking is a nightmare.</p>
<p dir="ltr">And my idea isn't exactly "gutting" the network. All it really is, is adding a Linux box as a master router. Then routing traffic through it. Simply installing some new pieces of equipment, then routing the existing traffic over to it.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 6, 2013 2:26 PM, "Glen Jarvis" <<a href="mailto:glen@glenjarvis.com">glen@glenjarvis.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
> The network at noisebridge is not a toy for you to play with.<br>
<br>
Disclaimer: I actually agree that it would be much more convenient if the network wasn't dramatically gutted when not necessary. I only point out the following technicality.<br>
<br>
<br>
This is "doacracy" at its best (and worst). Technically, it is a toy that people could play with. It's a shame the play wasn't "playing nicely" with the work already done (and previously working).<br>
<br>
Glen</blockquote></div>