[Sem] Retaining the SEM and building a sputter coater

[John McMaster]

Looked at the user manual in a little more detail.  These are the analog 
ones, we will have to come up with a separate display.  It might be a 
lot more convenient to spend a little more and get a gauge matched with 
a display. Multimeter, arduino + LCD, etc can work but we will have to 
do something to make it readable

On 07/10/2013 12:29 AM, Jeff Miller wrote:
> Actually, here's a pair of Mini Convectrons for about $40 shipping 
> included. We really could use 2 or 3. The one pictured has 1/8" npt 
> fittings, which are probably the most practical for us at this point.
>
> Ebay item #
> 231013652852
>
> I'm short on cash, but I could clean, test, and calibrate them. Anyone 
> feeling flush with $40?
>
> -Jeff
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Jeff Miller <mysterylectricity at yahoo.com>
> *To:* "sem at lists.noisebridge.net" <sem at lists.noisebridge.net>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 9, 2013 11:59 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Sem] Retaining the SEM and building a sputter coater
>
> Oh BTW how big is that diff pump? Water cooled I bet?
>
> I've been reading about how silver is a practical alternative to gold 
> for sputtering specimens. Looks promising.
>
> -Jeff
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* John McMaster <johndmcmaster at gmail.com>
> *To:* sem at lists.noisebridge.net
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 9, 2013 11:26 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Sem] Retaining the SEM and building a sputter coater
>
> FWIW I am converting my vacuum system from diffusion to turbo pumped.  
> Assuming it works (they are really expensive working so I had to piece 
> it together from eBay after doing a bunch of research) I may have a 
> Varian diffusion pump to donate to NB for SEM / sputter system use.  I 
> will try to play around with coating on my setup in the near future.
>
> Let me know if there is interest for people to discuss and plan things 
> out. I can usually only meet on weekends though.
>
> On 07/09/2013 12:08 AM, Jeff Miller wrote:
>> Well it's a bit of a catch-22. As long as there's ongoing interest in 
>> the SEM and we can keep it and the space free from decay, the SEM can 
>> stay. If it's underutilized and falls into disrepair, it should go 
>> somewhere it might be better appreciated.
>>
>> I haven't seen the space lately but it sounds finished enough.
>>
>> I think we should put the priority on building a sputter coater. It 
>> should be fairly simple to do. I've seen some pretty poor designs on 
>> YouTube that still sort of work. I think we could build a pretty nice 
>> one over 2 or 3 months of weekends, tops.
>>
>> Probably <$100 in parts that we can't scrounge or make for something 
>> quite nice.
>>
>> I'll be looking at commercial designs this week and try to come up 
>> with some plans this week and next.
>>
>> -Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SEM mailing list
>> SEM at lists.noisebridge.net  <mailto:SEM at lists.noisebridge.net>
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/sem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SEM mailing list
> SEM at lists.noisebridge.net <mailto:SEM at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/sem
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SEM mailing list
> SEM at lists.noisebridge.net <mailto:SEM at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/sem
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SEM mailing list
> SEM at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/sem

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/sem/attachments/20130710/cccd9e34/attachment-0003.html>