[Noisebridge-board] new members inducted tonight
rachel at xtreme.com
Wed May 6 15:43:40 UTC 2009
Maybe I'm just in a bad mood this morning, but if you have such strong
opinions on how new member processing ought to be done, perhaps you'd
like to step up and do it instead of criticizing how I'm doing it? Do
you really think that I think what I did yesterday is any kind of
permanent solution? Have you not noticed my continual attempts to
improve the process, andy my particular care to include privacy
concerns? Have a little faith!
OK now that that is off my chest, yes I agree with all of what you've
said. As I have time, I will continue to get better and better at this.
Of course, anyone else is welcome to do any of the things instead of me.
Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:31:38PM -0700, Rachel McConnell wrote:
> [snip two full names and emails]
>> inducted as members tonight. They have both told me in person that they
>> don't mind their full names and emails being on a publicly archived list.
> While I appreciate your checking with the new members, and I appreciate
> the desire to have a more functional accounting of our new members, I
> would like our default posture to be one of not disclosing personal
> information unless necessary. Data mining is only getting easier, and
> it's far easier to not publish information than to try to pull it back
> after it's discovered that it needs to be private.
> I'd prefer that Noisebridge be a place where the assumption is "we can't
> guarantee anything but we default to working for privacy" rather than
> "we'll be private if you really want, but by default we publish personal
> At the same time, I'm not trying to make more work for anybody.
> Could you (or other meeting-notes-taking type person) send this mail to
> the treasurer and secretary in the future, and if it's easy, send a
> summary to the board or discuss list? Just "we inducted two new members
> this week" should suffice.
> Note that there's a treasurer@ alias already; we could add a secretary@
> if we decide that's a good idea. (These are aliases, not lists, so
> they're @noisebridge.net not @lists.)
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.noisebridge.net
More information about the Board