[Noisebridge-board] Investment committee

Albert Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Thu Feb 24 00:37:30 UTC 2011

Is anyone else troubled by how little we actually follow the actual
bylaws of Noisebridge? For example, it doesn't mention anything about
consensus and says we take a majority vote on issues put to the


On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Dr. Jesus <j at hug.gs> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:
>> That sounds like an idea.
>> In other news, shouldn't we be shambling toward the
>> nomination/consensus process for the executive officers?
>> Somebody remind me what the process here is: I remember it all ending
>> with a pseudo-random allocation of Jof, but I also vaguely recall
>> nominations being board-initiated.
> It was a regular membership meeting if I remember correctly, but there
> was too much booze for any decisions which were made to be rational.
> The bylaws say that the board elects the officers, full stop.  How
> much the membership should be involved is up to the board.
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/board

More information about the Board mailing list