[CQ] noisebridge hamnet?

[Mark Cohen]

Hey Michael,

I'm totally behind this as well and would be happy to be net control.  
I only suggest that we use a repeater that all of us can work and we  
can have a MOU with the repeater owner. For example, the CARLA group  
has the 442.075 repeater that has amazing coverage, but its a linked  
repeater system.. So the owner would have to unlink it just before and  
re-link it just after the net. Alternatively, I know that the MDARC  
(Mount Diablo Amateur Radio Club) repeater also has great coverage,  
its not a linked system and there would be lots of hams into checking  
in. They often have a net where there is a question posed and people  
answer.

In any event, I'd like to see this happen.

73, de K6EF


On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Michael Shiloh wrote:

> so awhile back i tried to create a dorkbot hamnet; that is, a ham net
> for anyone interested in dorkbotty-like things.
>
> kinda stumbled along for 5-6 weeks, sometimes just two of us, once as
> many as 6 or 7. we picked up a couple who happened to hear us.
>
> kinda fizzled out.
>
> wanna try something like that? i don't have a specific purpose in  
> mind,
> other than just to extend my geekiness into the radio waves as well.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ mailing list
> CQ at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/cq

Mark Cohen
markc at binaryfaith.com

Science is a way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine  
understanding of human fallibility.
-Carl Sagan, 1996