[Cyborg] [EEG] Apparently Emotiv Epoc works with BCI2000 P300 Speller.

[Jean Rintoul]

pfft! We should totally have a consumer EEG headset face off when we have
one of each. Who can levitate the ball and run the P300 speller best? May
the force be with you.

Neat regarding Kyle's python enquiries.

Looking forward to checking out the new headsets as I haven't seen anything
other than a power point slideshow as yet, and I do think they have the
potential to be better, and I hope they are.
I wonder what the retail price will be for these headsets?

For what it's worth, I'm not as impressed as I should be at the BioSemi
hardware either, with their ribbons and bits breaking. That one costs orders
of magnitude more than anything on or near the consumer market, and is the
industry standard.

Jean

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:

> Incidentally all, there ARE better headsets on the verge of entering
> the consumer market. (I've seen them demo-ed in our lab, and Jean may
> have too)
>
> I wouldn't really recommend investing any energy in the Emotiv EPOC.
> It's not quality hardware.
>
> -Kelly
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 15:15, Jonathan Foote <jtfoote at ieee.org> wrote:
> > Just a note that I lent the Emotiv headset I got from a friend to Kyle
> > Machulis (qDot). He's a superb hacker and I can't wait to pick his
> > brains (so to speak!). Looks like he's already got a Python library
> > up!
> >
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/qdot76367/5069428178/\<http://www.flickr.com/photos/qdot76367/5069428178/%5C>
> > http://github.com/qdot/Emokit
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Jean Rintoul <jean.rintoul at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I dunno!
> >> Encryption will be broken again soon. Pay $500 right now! is the correct
> >> answer. :P
> >>
> >> Jean
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Todd Anderson <tanders at stanford.edu>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was going to say "I can't believe $300 doesn't cover the cost of the
> >>> headset", but then I realized I was thinking in a consumer context and
> not a
> >>> lab mindset (in a lab context, such a device must be $3,000 or so, if
> it was
> >>> reliable).  Anyway, does this mean get on it quick if you want
> low-level
> >>> data access, or will the encryption be broken again in the next
> version?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Jean Rintoul <jean.rintoul at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> That is all.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hail!
> >>>>
> >>>> The Emokit hack sounds like it won't work in future Emotiv SDK
> >>>> iterations, as they are currently losing money on the hardware, and
> are only
> >>>> making money on the research licenses. Oh well. Such is business. They
> need
> >>>> some big game company to pick up the product and develop around it so
> they
> >>>> can sell lots or something.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jean
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Cyborg mailing list
> >>>> Cyborg at lists.noisebridge.net
> >>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/cyborg
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://www.octotod.net
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> EEG mailing list
> >> EEG at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/eeg
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > EEG mailing list
> > EEG at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/eeg
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Cyborg mailing list
> Cyborg at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/cyborg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/cyborg/attachments/20101011/e8785407/attachment-0003.html>