[Noisebridge-announce] [Noisebridge-discuss] 2169 Mission, let's do it - please respond if you disagree
rachel at xtreme.com
Tue Aug 4 22:23:27 UTC 2009
Reply from Alex on IRC:
rachel-: Alex/VonGuard was researching our legal responsibilities under
[3:20pm] rachel-: act, and the last I heard about this we are
responsible only for the
[3:20pm] rachel-: inside of the space. Alex can you confirm that this
is the result of
[3:20pm] rachel-: your research?
[3:20pm] VonGuard: yeah
[3:20pm] VonGuard: that is the result
[3:20pm] rachel-: ok!
[3:21pm] VonGuard: the landlord has to take care of the elevator and
[3:21pm] VonGuard: unless the hallways are ours
[3:21pm] VonGuard: so initially, it should be up to code when we rent
it, but i know they're not down with up to code stuff there
[3:21pm] VonGuard: so it could ge squishy if a problem arrises, and the
landlord says "Oh it was up to code before, you made it not up to code"
[3:21pm] VonGuard: which owuld be a lie
[3:21pm] VonGuard: but you know
[3:22pm] VonGuard: so, basically, our mandate on ADA is: don't make it
worse than it is when we get it, and make the bathrooms hospitable to
[3:22pm] VonGuard: cause the landlord said so
[3:22pm] rachel-: thx VonGuard
Rachel McConnell wrote:
> The landlord has made a very generous offer to get us moved in there,
> which is that they'll spend $6000 for the bathroom renovation. Andy was
> able to get a preliminary quote of something close to that (which he's
> in process of confirming if I'm not mistaken). For me, this is enough
> to kick my opinion over into, let's go with this space and make it work.
> Because we can make anything work if we choose to, and I think this
> space is worth the effort.
> I'm putting 'decide about renting 2169 Mission' on tonight's agenda for
> consensus. I'm fairly confident the membership is good with this, but
> if I'm wrong and you don't want to rent this space or just have
> reservations, or even just feel this is too fast, please speak up either
> in reply to this email or at the meeting.
> Note that this is NOT a consensus about how to do the buildout, but only
> a GO / NO GO decision on moving forward with this space, so we can
> concentrate our limited time & energy. Here are some points of note:
> * Current proposed lease is attached to the wiki at
> https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Moving/2169_Mission (direct link,
> Note that we could continue to negotiate on this but it's satisfactory
> to me.
> * Alex/VonGuard was researching our legal responsibilities under the ADA
> act, and the last I heard about this we are responsible only for the
> inside of the space. Alex can you confirm that this is the result of
> your research?
> * the estimate for the bathroom renovation is for ADA compliant work
> (Andy can you confirm this?)
> NEW SPACE W00T
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
More information about the Noisebridge-announce