[Noisebridge-discuss] Access System

Alex Perez aperez at alexperez.com
Thu Nov 20 23:03:24 UTC 2008


And that of course raises the question: Should the will of 5-10% of  
any given group trump the will of the other 90%? Not exactly a new  
problem...


On Nov 20, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Al Billings wrote:

> On 11/20/08 12:55 PM, t3579 at lavabit.com wrote:
>> Hello to all,
>>
>> after fiddling around with the AnonAccess i don't think i'm able  
>> get it up
>> and running until i leave. Since most people i talked to want to  
>> have "the
>> Brute" and replace the current lock/keys but don't care too much  
>> about
>> anonymity, i would propose that i switch to working on the cerberus  
>> Access
>> Control. It seems to be much more mature than the Labor project.  
>> After the
>> cerberus is done i will continue to work on the AnonAccess.  
>> Noisebridge
>> will be able to upgrade the system later.
>> I said publicly that i will help to build an access system, so this  
>> would
>> be a  trade-off between the my work so far and my time left here is  
>> SF.
>> What are your opinions?
>>
>
> There are a few people overwhelmingly focused on anonymity in their  
> access and use of the space (see camera discussion) so this may be  
> problematic.
>
> Al
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list