[Noisebridge-discuss] More details for the nap pods ^W^W electronic workspace?
jim
jim at well.com
Fri Nov 28 17:00:40 UTC 2008
my opinion:
as i understand it, there is a proposal for
a permanent sleeping area (naps).
i don't like it because
* it encourages sleeping at 83C
* it strikes me as a poor use of space:
hopefully it will not be much used (if it is
much used, that may be a poor improvement).
* people tend to be considerate, and if
someone's sleeping anywhere, that will have
a constraining effect on others' activities,
in the upstairs area in this case.
* the three couches seem adequate for the
occasional napper.
if some kind of workbench/desk were installed
in the proposed area, the floor beneath, possibly
the surface itself, could serve as a place for
nappers (maybe with a sleeping bag or blanket or
some such).
i'd be willing to scribble up some plans for a
workbench/desk use of that space if people wish it.
briefly:
* worksurface fills entire cavity at about waist
height (it's possible to make this adjustable in
height, tho' such a design probably would
disallow sleeping on the surface);
* shelves and storage bins above 40 inches off
the floor;
* electrical outlets in sufficient numbers
(this could include a set of one or more
receptacles with limited amperage but driven
by isolation transformers);
* shallow storage shelves beneath the work
surface (which could allow a napper as well,
if that's wanted).
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 01:44 -0800, Rubin Abdi wrote:
> Branching off from the electronics thread. Rachel asked on where we're
> at with this, as she hasn't seen it come up in discussion, David M
> said the group stated it wants more details before we go forward with
> this.
>
> It's rather hard to gage what the group means by "more details."
>
> It'll be bunk beds in the larger of the two closet. The cost will be
> initially out of pocket for new materials needed, though I'm pretty
> sure much of it will be donated. Once work has been completed, we'll
> come back to the group with receipts and figure out if this is
> something the group wants to pay for or not. If not then the cost is
> covered with donations from folks who paid for materials (Reed, Peter,
> Jake and I).
>
> Figuring out how to build the actual bunks (out of wood) will take
> place as we're building it. We plan to not modify the building, since
> this was stated early on to everyone when we jumped into the space.
>
> If the group wants more details then what I've just listed here (which
> from what I remember is pretty much what has been stated at previous
> meetings), it would be nice if we could get a list of what "more
> details" means At the same time I (opinionated statement here) feel
> that requesting more information is going to lead to micro managing
> this task, which is rather ridiculous with the number of people that
> participate in the group meetings.
>
> In short, we would like to build bunk beds in the bigger closet,
> Noisebridge can figure out if they want to pay for it or not after
> it's been installed. If you have an opinion on how they should be
> built, email me and I'll tell you when we're going to build it so you
> can come and help out. Would Noisebridge like to go forward with this
> plan, please circle one and send back:
>
> YES / NO
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Rubin Abdi
> Rubin at Starset.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list