[Noisebridge-discuss] 2169 Mission, let's do it - please respond if you disagree

[daniela Steinsapir]

 This is great! I hope we will move forward!

Daniela

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Rachel McConnell <rachel at xtreme.com> wrote:

> Reply from Alex on IRC:
>
> rachel-: Alex/VonGuard was researching our legal responsibilities under
> the ADA
> [3:20pm] rachel-: act, and the last I heard about this we are
> responsible only for the
> [3:20pm] rachel-: inside of the space.  Alex can you confirm that this
> is the result of
> [3:20pm] rachel-: your research?
> [3:20pm] VonGuard: yeah
> [3:20pm] VonGuard: that is the result
> [3:20pm] rachel-: ok!
> [3:21pm] VonGuard: the landlord has to take care of the elevator and
> hallways
> [3:21pm] VonGuard: unless the hallways are ours
> [3:21pm] VonGuard: so initially, it should be up to code when we rent
> it, but i know they're not down with up to code stuff there
> [3:21pm] VonGuard: so it could ge squishy if a problem arrises, and the
> landlord says "Oh it was up to code before, you made it not up to code"
> [3:21pm] VonGuard: which owuld be a lie
> [3:21pm] VonGuard: but you know
> [3:22pm] VonGuard: so, basically, our mandate on ADA is: don't make it
> worse than it is when we get it, and make the bathrooms hospitable to
> ADA people
> [3:22pm] VonGuard: cause the landlord said so
> [3:22pm] rachel-: thx VonGuard
>
> Rachel McConnell wrote:
> > The landlord has made a very generous offer to get us moved in there,
> > which is that they'll spend $6000 for the bathroom renovation.  Andy was
> > able to get a preliminary quote of something close to that (which he's
> > in process of confirming if I'm not mistaken).  For me, this is enough
> > to kick my opinion over into, let's go with this space and make it work.
> >  Because we can make anything work if we choose to, and I think this
> > space is worth the effort.
> >
> > I'm putting 'decide about renting 2169 Mission' on tonight's agenda for
> > consensus.  I'm fairly confident the membership is good with this, but
> > if I'm wrong and you don't want to rent this space or just have
> > reservations, or even just feel this is too fast, please speak up either
> > in reply to this email or at the meeting.
> >
> > Note that this is NOT a consensus about how to do the buildout, but only
> > a GO / NO GO decision on moving forward with this space, so we can
> > concentrate our limited time & energy.  Here are some points of note:
> >
> > * Current proposed lease is attached to the wiki at
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Moving/2169_Mission (direct link,
> >
> https://www.noisebridge.net/images/1/16/107_NoiseBridge_lease_draft_02.pdf
> ).
> > Note that we could continue to negotiate on this but it's satisfactory
> > to me.
> >
> > * Alex/VonGuard was researching our legal responsibilities under the ADA
> > act, and the last I heard about this we are responsible only for the
> > inside of the space.  Alex can you confirm that this is the result of
> > your research?
> >
> > * the estimate for the bathroom renovation is for ADA compliant work
> > (Andy can you confirm this?)
> >
> > NEW SPACE W00T
> >
> > Rachel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 
www.danielast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20090804/2d926a24/attachment-0003.html>