[Noisebridge-discuss] Save the sewing
jim
jim at well.com
Sat Aug 15 01:40:14 UTC 2009
+1
this makes sense to me. i'm willing to respect
a shared tool and support protecting it from
destruction.
i don't think noisebridge should be held
responsible for a tool's health, but the community
seems already to support the concept of shared
tools and seems right to me that some group could
bring in a shared tool that they and not the
unwashed use to do stuff.
> I'm not willing to donate the machine; I like it and want to continue
> using it if I happen to go elsewhere. However, I don't particularly
> mind using it at Noisebridge, and it might as well get used by y'all
> instead of sitting in my closet between uses. I can understand the
> reasons you mentioned, but this is what I'm offering.
>
> Re. the damage issue: it'd be possible to set up a fund to pay for
> minor damages to loaned equipment, consider the use of it effectively
> something like a pretty low rental fee, and not accept loans that have
> plausible damages more than some reasonable limit. Or people could
> simply be excellent and fix / replace things they break. *shrug*
>
> I'll abstain from any other discussion of whether the rule ought to be
> changed; just suggesting one possible mitigation.
>
> - Sai
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list