[Noisebridge-discuss] Distributed computing and storage (with some major caveats)

[d p chang]

Sai Emrys <noisebridge at saizai.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:26 PM, d p chang<weasel at meer.net> wrote:
>> out of curiosity, is this feature set suggesting that the data come/go
>> w/ the nodes so that an action is local to the node (possibly
>> replicated)?
>
> I'm not sure I understand your question.
>
> All data should be replicated redundantly across nodes, so that it can
> survive any node going down without loss of the data that that node
> may have generated (or proxied).

ok. i was mostly wondering if this was a 'simplification' in that nodes
intentionally had 'partitions' of the complete data set.

\p

---
It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the
public expence, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something
more than in that proportion. - Adam Smith