[Noisebridge-discuss] openeeg

Al Billings albill at arcanology.com
Thu Mar 19 17:51:24 UTC 2009


On 3/18/09 4:49 PM, Jonathan Foote wrote:
> It's clearly not "all noise" but getting signal is a Hard Problem, and
> I've seen little success with low-electrode-count approaches like
> OpenEEG (though I would love to be proved wrong on that). The
> technology is very straightforward (high-impedance high-gain
> amplifiers) and I'm afraid I don't have any special sauce to success
> other than reminding people what has been shown to work: multiple
> channels (19 is standard) and medical-grade electrodes (yes, with the
> conductive jelly).
>    

  I just did my second sleep study (for a mild sleep apnea). Ten 
electrodes on the head with nasty conductive paste. Fun stuff. You have 
to shower to get it out of your hair.

Al



More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list