[Noisebridge-discuss] Proposed After Effects / VFX compositing class

[William Heath]

Well I guess we would need to purchase adobe after affects to learn all that
your teaching correct?  What is all the software we would have to purchase
and how much would it cost?
-Tim

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:02 PM, sfslim <sfslim at gmail.com> wrote:

> I encourage you to research this if it is of interest to you. I am
> personally unaware of any free or open source VFX compositing packages at
> present. (That does not mean than one does not exist of course. In fact, I'd
> be rather surprised if one didn't.)
>
> It may be worth noting that my expertise lays chiefly with After Effects.
> I've used other compositing apps, but AE is where I've spent the bulk of my
> time over the past thirteen years. It's where I'm a gunslinger.
>
> I could, of course, teach an application-agnostic VFX compositing class,
> focusing more on basic comping operations and theory, but such a class
> doesn't nearly take full advantage of my skills, and the same information
> could be acquired by most Noisebridgers (who are generally smarter than the
> average bear) by spending a few nights with any one of the several excellent
> intro to compositing texts that are available.
>
> This class, at least as currently envisioned, arose largely in response to
> a number of Noisebridgers who've been asking me to teach them about AE
> specifically. And, unavoidably, much of what such a class would have to
> contain would need to be AE-specific.
>
> I should say that I have absolutely nothing against free or open source
> options. And I certainly welcome users of any package to attend my class; I
> will endeavor to make as much of the lesson content as possible broadly
> applicible, and support people in achieving successful photo-real composites
> in whatever package they choose. Tool agnosticism is a very useful skill for
> a working compositors, and I encourage all my students to practice it.
>
> Lastly, it may be of use to note that Adobe offers a full version of AE CS4
> on their site as a free download with a 30 day trial. That may be enough for
> non owners of AE to accomplish a fair bit in this class before making a
> purchase decision.
>
>
>
>
> [Sent from a mobile device, with apologies for brevity]
>
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:45 AM, William Heath <wgheath at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Aaron,
> Can you pretty please respond to the use of free tools like blender for
> this.  Is that realistic or not?
>
> -Tim
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Star St.Germain < <thisisstar at gmail.com>
> thisisstar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am very into this idea & would show up in the proposed timeslot if
>> things could work out with the scienceyfolks.
>>
>> <3
>> Star
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Aaron Muszalski < <sfslim at gmail.com>
>> sfslim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Rachel McConnell < <rachel at xtreme.com>
>>> rachel at xtreme.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > This is a fairly new event so it's hard to say if it and your class
>>> > would easily coexist or only with some difficulty.  What do the
>>> planners
>>> > of the SciEnDesHud think?
>>>
>>> Though I'm not a SciEnDesHud planner, my sense (based on my
>>> impressions of the NB space) is that holding two concurrent groups is
>>> possible, one upstairs and one downstairs. And as the calendar fills
>>> up (well done everyone - Go Enthusiasm!) this issue may become
>>> increasingly harder to avoid.
>>>
>>> That said, I am entirely open to alternate options, be it spaces or time
>>> slots.
>>>
>>> My schedule is open all day Tuesday and Thursday (I teach Mondays,
>>> Wednesdays and Fridays) and I assume that an evening time slot is
>>> preferable for most people with day jobs. The NB meeting is on
>>> Tuesdays, which is why I proposed Thursdays.
>>>
>>> Oh, and I suppose I should mention that my class would work much
>>> better if we had use of the projector. So if SciEnDesHud already has a
>>> claim on that, that would be a good reason to consider relocating the
>>> VFX class.
>>>
>>> Again, thank you everyone for your continued input (and also the
>>> gnashing)!
>>>
>>> - Slim
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>  <Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>  <https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss>
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------
>> thisisstar.com
>> thisisstar.dpcprints.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>  <Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>  <https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss>
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20090325/dbdac5c1/attachment-0003.html>