[Noisebridge-discuss] Interaction with the police during the night of the 31st in regards to the fire escape and ladder to roof.

[mark burdett]

And, noisebridge has the right to refuse entry to the police.

--mark

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Christopher Nielsen <m4dh4tt3r at gmail.com>wrote:

> While you are correct that homes are more protected, public space or
> not, Noisebridge is private property, not public property. Police
> still do not have a right to enter without consent, probable cause, or
> a warrant.
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 13:58, Sai Emrys <noisebridge at saizai.com> wrote:
> >> But here is the relevant part to physical police presence at the space
> >> starts at exactly 30:00 in.
> >
> > That's oriented at police entry to *homes*. That's far more legally
> > protected than entry to a public place, which Noisebridge clearly is
> > (despite having doors, we have a stated policy that essentially anyone
> > is welcome to come by whenever).
> >
> > - Sai
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Christopher Nielsen
> "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary
> safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20091102/537f0577/attachment-0003.html>