[Noisebridge-discuss] non-excellent couch behavior

[Rich Gibson]

I am confused.  Why should people who want to undo have primacy?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 13, 2009, at 7:13 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:

> Heh, I can't condone adding another RULE, but I do think that it's a
> good description of excellence.  So we have:
>
> A) It is excellent to DO things
> B) If your doing is undone, it is excellent to then seek the dreaded
> trial of Talking To Other People.
>
> Can we handle that, nerds?
>
> -K
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Sai Emrys <noisebridge at saizai.com>  
> wrote:
>> From an offlist conversation, since it seems of  general relevance:
>>
>> I think it might be pointful to have a "1 revert rule" policy.  
>> Someone
>> can do X, someone else can undo it, the first someone shouldn't redo
>> it without consultation.
>>
>> This would help ensure that if people have a disagreement over what
>> should be done, it's solved by discussion rather than attrition.
>>
>> - Sai
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss