[Noisebridge-discuss] Thoughts on anonymity and trading.
Jason Dusek
jason.dusek at gmail.com
Sun Oct 25 01:36:27 UTC 2009
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal discusses ways in
which insider trading helps to correct market inaccuracies.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704224004574489324091790350.html
So, say we allow insider trading and it has this nice effect
on the market, that broken companies are known to be broken
right away. Won't insiders who trade be at substantial risk
for punishment by their employers should they ever be
discovered? Is strong anonymity a requirement for free markets
where everyone -- not just those outside an institution -- are
able to "trade their conscience"? What technical and
administrative layers are required to support authentic yet
anonymous trading?
Maybe we can get away with not identifying a person as long as
we identify a "trade" as such? Then the payment provider and
the fulfiller can both communicate with the buyer/seller
through their "trade" keys?
--
Jason Dusek
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list