[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus and the "old ways".

[Brian Molnar]

Well it certainly sounds like there would be a bootstrapping issue moving to
a vote-based process, since any dissenting member could block the decision
to move over.

- Brian


On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:31 AM, David Rorex <drorex at gmail.com> wrote:

> -1
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Al Billings <albill at openbuddha.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2009, at 9:03 AM, jim wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 14:17 -0700, Jason Dusek wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>  we've followed consensus in a way that makes adjustment far
>>> >>  more difficult than it needs to be.
>>> >
>>> > what's an improvement?
>>>
>>> Voting.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher at gmail.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20091002/af09d987/attachment-0003.html>