[Noisebridge-discuss] Fwd: Consensus and the "old ways".

[Liz Henry]

It's interesting how those assumptions don't hold true for everyone.


I would way rather be criticized in public, otherwise it can potentially
turn into abuse and cruelty with no witness. Public criticism at least
has a sanity check to it. Potentially.


- liz


Shannon Lee wrote:
> Generally, the rule is just the opposite:  praise in public, criticize in
> private.
> -
> -S
> 
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jason Dusek <jason.dusek at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 2009/10/02 Al Billings <albill at openbuddha.com>:
>>> I think this was meant for the list, not me, since this isn't
>>> about me and I'm done with this for now.
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> From: Shannon Lee <shannon at scatter.com>
>>> Date: October 2, 2009 10:54:12 AM PDT
>>> To: Al Billings <albill at openbuddha.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus and the "old ways".
>>>
>>> Dude,
>>> Throwing a public tantrum about how your neeeds aren't being
>>> met and then refusing to talk about it is childish.  You have
>>> my attention, but in 24 hours I'll be done with this.
>>   A rule I'd like to see: no private censure.
>>
>> --
>> Jason Dusek
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss


-- 

------------------------
Liz Henry
liz at blogher.com
liz at bookmaniac.net
http://liz-henry.blogspot.com

"Without models, it's hard to work; without a context, difficult to
evaluate; without peers, nearly impossible to speak." -- Joanna Russ