[Noisebridge-discuss] Deep Crack

[Jacob Appelbaum]

Jeffrey Malone wrote:
> I fully understand the historical significance of this machine, and
> the prestige that Noisebridge would have in hosting it.
> 

Ok. I don't doubt that at all.

> However, I object to it being at Noisebridge, as it violates our
> current policies which you yourself have vehemently defended, and
> leaves us open to a large amount of liability.

So does this mean that you've decided that it's not OK for people to
host large objects at the space that do not fit on the shelf?

The discussion from last night about Rachel's hypothetical large
furniture sized sewing machine seem relevant here. Is there a grey area
about some things?

Do you interpret our current policies as "no personal possessions in the
space even during limited projects" or am I reading that wrong?

The discussion of liability is perhaps only relevant if we can even
bring the thing into the space.

Best,
Jake

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20091007/76af9c77/attachment-0003.sig>