[Noisebridge-discuss] VPN from the noisebridge network.

Crutcher Dunnavant crutcher at gmail.com
Thu Oct 15 01:51:30 UTC 2009


how about 'noisebridge-exposed'? or 'noisebridge-bareback'?

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com> wrote:

> Excerpts from Dr. Jesus's message of Wed Oct 14 18:24:58 -0700 2009:
> > FWIW, Jof and I had a look at this and saw that the flashrd router was
> > refusing to nat the nat-t packets on udp 4500, transmitting them to
> > sonic with rfc 1918 source addresses.  We couldn't figure out why that
> > was happening.
>
> But strangely, UDP/500 ISAKMP/IKE to the same VPN endpoint gets NATed
> just fine. Weird!
>
> Maybe I should bring back the "noisebridge-public" network as a
> workaround.  This was a separate VLAN and wireless network at 83c that
> handed out routable public IPs instead of NATed ones.
>
> Downside: it's up to the users to implement host-local firewalling.
>
> --j
>



-- 
Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20091014/ebe2bf79/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list