[Noisebridge-discuss] Is there a good way to do incrementally updated torrents?
Shannon Lee
shannon at scatter.com
Tue Dec 7 20:04:23 UTC 2010
Right. But if you do the naming right, the practical outcome isn't that
different...
I did say it wasn't the best solution :)
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Sai <sai at saizai.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Shannon Lee <shannon at scatter.com> wrote:
> > Most bittorrent clients are capable of supporting RSS. It's not the best
> > solution, as it requires a central place to serve rss from, but...
> > See the pirate bay for an example.
>
> AFAICT (please correct), that's just a more automated way of
> distributing new torrents for every file/batch - not of sharing files
> between torrents or updating torrents w/ new files "in place".
>
> - Sai
>
--
Shannon Lee
(503) 539-3700
"Any sufficiently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20101207/0862e1e2/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list