[Noisebridge-discuss] Is there a good way to do incrementally updated torrents?

Shannon Lee shannon at scatter.com
Tue Dec 7 20:04:23 UTC 2010


Right.  But if you do the naming right, the practical outcome isn't that
different...

I did say it wasn't the best solution :)

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Sai <sai at saizai.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Shannon Lee <shannon at scatter.com> wrote:
> > Most bittorrent clients are capable of supporting RSS.  It's not the best
> > solution, as it requires a central place to serve rss from, but...
> > See the pirate bay for an example.
>
> AFAICT (please correct), that's just a more automated way of
> distributing new torrents for every file/batch - not of sharing files
> between torrents or updating torrents w/ new files "in place".
>
> - Sai
>



-- 
Shannon Lee
(503) 539-3700

"Any sufficiently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20101207/0862e1e2/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list