[Noisebridge-discuss] Sleeping at NB

[L E]

Action?  I dunno, but I had some signage thoughts intrude into my brain. 

 - All sleep-study subjects must sign up on a SleepBridge authorization 
terminal.

 - Why sleep when you can hack something? 

 - Sleep when you're dead.  Until then, hack away.

 - You don't have to go home, but you can't sleep here.

 - All sleepers are subject to sudden random experimentation.  Sweet dreams; 
this won't hurt a bit.

 - MedBridge thanks you in advance for your kidney donation obtained during your 
contributory nap.

 - All sleepers are assumed to be dead, and are subject to cardiopulmonary 
resuscitation by 911-summoned trained EMT or SFFD personnel. 


 - Inertness is deprecated.



>
>From: Shannon Lee <shannon at scatter.com>
>To: Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com>
>Cc: "noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net" 
><noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>Sent: Fri, December 24, 2010 11:54:15 AM
>Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Sleeping at NB
>
>
>So what physical action should actually be taken?
>
>--S
>
>
>--
>
>
>Shannon Lee
>(503) 539-3700
>
>On Dec 24, 2010, at 11:47, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Ok so.  I am usually pretty quiet on this list.  I am not a member but I am 
>going to quote my last talk at 5 minutes of fame concerning public transit which 
>also seems very applicable here.  For being a city of such smart people, you are 
>all fucking retarded.  There is only one way to solve this.  We need to find out 
>if it is indeed against our lease.  It doesn't matter if the same people are 
>doing it or if it is different people every single night of the week.  If we are 
>not supposed to have people "living" here which could be someone (count 1) 
>person, even if different every night, could make us get kicked the f out of 
>2169 mission, we are being selfish and mentally handicapped.  If it is against 
>the rules (not even set by the almighty noisebridge or even involving consensus) 
>we HAVE to enforce it.  I personally am going to take a few minutes to review 
>the lease if I can find a copy or speak to someone who you know, actually knows. 
> Personally, if I find out in my research that we are not supposed to, the path 
>is very clear.  No one does it.  I would hope someone would actually have some 
>balls to either say STOP or something else such as calling the landlord and 
>putting complaints in.  No offense, if noisebridge cannot pull it's own head out 
>of it's own rectum, you might need some type of outside intervention to put 
>things into check.   Sorry for the doucheyness but this really isn't something 
>we should still be talking about.  Keep It Simple Stupid is a good idea in this 
>situation.   
>>
>>
>>On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Sai <noisebridge at saizai.com> wrote:
>>
>>On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Shannon Lee <shannon at scatter.com> wrote:
>>>> This is the traffic light problem -- you've got a bunch of people at a
>>>> corner waiting to cross.
>>>
>>>That is an interesting analogy to make. Here is the anarchist (à la
>>>Moxie) equivalent in your analogy:
>>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Cassini
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_space
>>>
>>>- Sai
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>Ronald Cotoni
>>Systems Engineer
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20101224/fc45f85b/attachment-0003.html>