[Noisebridge-discuss] [drama] New logo = terrorism?

[Jacob Appelbaum]

Jonathan Foote wrote:
> So where exactly is the consensus on this?
> 
> They may have had cool logos, but let's not forget the RAF and the
> Weather Underground committed acts of violence against civilians.
> The RAF killed 34 people in bombings and shootings. The WU was
> clueless as well as well as violent, killing its own members with an
> ineptly constructed nail bomb.
> 
> None of this constitutes excellence in my book.
> 
> How is the new logo not representative of -- or linked to -- violence
> and ineptitude?
> 

I think you've committed the 21st century version of Godwin's law by
calling the new logo terrorism. We need a word for that; anyone?

Best,
Jake

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100109/01cd2093/attachment-0003.sig>