[Noisebridge-discuss] NoisyCalendary

jim jim at well.com
Sun Jan 24 04:55:05 UTC 2010


+1. some point of contact, some audit trail and 
responsible party with whom/which to negotiate 
or arrange things. that seems well and completely 
said. 




On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 17:07 -0800, Ever Falling wrote:
> i'm not sure a calender (something that deals with planning and
> resources, both of which would need names behind them to make sure
> people have a point of contact for collaborating and organizing with
> them) can be done with anonymous editing. i think we should try a set
> up that requires some sort of identification and then see if anything
> pops up that makes a valid reason for needing anonymity. slapping it
> in there by default seems unwise to me. i think noisebridge seems to
> want its cake and eat it too when it comes to "anonymity + anything
> else" but that's a whole different discussion altogether.
> 
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Ian Atha <thatha at thatha.org> wrote:
>         Jim,
>         
>         I see a number of _anonymous_ edits on the wikipage for the
>         Linux
>         System Administration Study Group
>         (https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Linux_System_Administration_Study_Group&action=history).
>         Isn't this you?
>         
>         -ian.
>         
>         
>         On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 16:48, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
>         >
>         >   oh, i don't get why anonymous edits:
>         >   anonymity seems antithetical to accountabilty, and
>         > it seems to me things that our community depends on
>         > ought to have some accountability track: who's claiming
>         > what resources and why. requiring a name also reduces
>         > the vulnerability to malice and pranks.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:36 -0800, Ian Atha wrote:
>         >> Hey folks,
>         >>
>         >> Leif and I are meeting up at 2169 today circa 3pm to
>         brainstorm about
>         >> the implementation of the One True Noisebridge Calendar. If
>         you have
>         >> anything you'd like us to consider now's the time to speak!
>         >>
>         >> For your reference, voilá Kelly's specs:
>         >>
>         >> - Publicly editable, anonymously editable
>         >> - Publicly linkable
>         >> - Has the usual variety of calendar layouts (day, week,
>         month, list)
>         >> - The usual calendar capabilities (description field,
>         repeating events)
>         >> - iCal feed, RSS feed
>         >> - Some sort of feed which can auto-update the wiki homepage
>         >> - Probably free
>         >> - Hosted locally(ish)
>         >>
>         >> And bonus options:
>         >> - Can use wiki logins or some other kind of identification
>         in addition
>         >> to anonymous
>         >> - Events have a field for which room/area of NB
>         >> - Calendars show which room/area of NB
>         >> - open source or some other moral superiority
>         >> - easy publishing to email (for nb-announce, for instance)
>         >> - misc bells and whistles
>         >>
>         >> I'd heart you so much more if we keep this thread relevant!
>         >>
>         >>
>         >> -ian.
>         >> _______________________________________________
>         >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>         >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>         >>
>         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>         >
>         >
>         _______________________________________________
>         Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>         Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Trying to fix or change something, only guarantees and perpetuates its
> existence.




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list