[Noisebridge-discuss] Agora Link Service

[aestetix aestetix]

Hey, glad to see discussion on this here!

This has been a work in progress for a while. I've brought it up at the
meetings several times, mentioned it on the ops list, and even was part of a
talk on the project we gave at 26c3.

We'd been trying to get things working, but only solidified all the steps to
do so recently. I've been *extremely* busy since the New Year, and haven't
had the time to bring in a new system and set it up--the existing node for
Noisebridge was a test system I created to see if we could get functionality
off existing hardware. Shannon said he was going to bring in a system to run
this on, but if you want to take a technical lead on it, that would rock!

We're currently working on a more robust FAQ and documentation with purpose
and our mission statement, but it's going to be a really worthwhile project.

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com> wrote:

> Excerpts from Eric Michaud's message of Tue Jan 26 15:52:22 -0800 2010:
> > Huh,
> >
> > It says on the node list that Noisebridge has been assigned
> 10.100.4.0/23range.
> >
> > [noisebridge]
> > gatewayhost=pony.noisebridge.net
> > network=10.100.4.0/23
> >
> > Scroll down https://www.vpn.hamburg.ccc.de/tinc-chaosvpn.txt
>
> Ah, I see. This content isn't well linked, it seems.
>
> Cool, so this looks like a point-to-multipoint IPv4 L3VPN using tinc.
> Looks like there's some configuration on pony, but it's not fully setup.
>
> Eric, did you set that up? Want me to get it working?
>
> I've not worked with this chaosvpn setup in the past, but it looks like
> they have a perl script to pull a tinc config periodically.
>
>
> One thing that comes to mind though: should this be routed through pony
> and the same internal network that everyone at 2169 uses?
> Currently, the local DHCP daemon points people's default routes at the
> router in the Soekris host. We could enable forwarding and firewalling
> on pony and point the Soekris' routes for ChaosVPN IP space at pony's
> internal IP, and this could all "just work" (well, "just route").
>
> But should pony be reachable via the ChaosVPN and should internal users
> be able to NAT to some ChaosVPN IP space for things within this
> darknet/VPN?
>
> Alternatively, we could create a separate layer-2 / switch network to
> connect users to this VPN network.
>
> What do people on the list think? Would you like to have tunneled IP
> connectivity to other hackerspaces while you're at 2169?
>
> Cheers,
> jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100127/ce02804b/attachment-0003.html>