[Noisebridge-discuss] N00b question - changing power supply voltage

Tymm Twillman tymmothy at gmail.com
Wed Jul 7 03:15:31 UTC 2010


any reason for not just getting something like this:

http://www.allelectronics.com/make-a-store/item/PS-1512/12V-12A-FAN-COOLED-POWER-SUPPLY/1.html

and hooking up a power transistor (or better yet a mosfet) to an Arduino & PWM it for temperature control?



On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Josh Myer wrote:

> TO-3, yeah, typo.  They'll go up to 1.5A, which is far more power than I've ever used =)
> 
> The LM338 looks great.  I can't find them for less than $8, but that's still a really good deal.  I needed exactly this for a project idea I had recently... maybe it's time to revisit that idea.
> --
> /jbm
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:37 AM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
> 
>   i'd tho't 7812s were only available in 1 Amp
> form; are there higher Amperages available for
> 78XX regulators?
>   i'm guessing you mean TO-3 rather than TO-2,
> yes?
>   there's a variable voltage regulator, LM338,
> that comes in a steel TO-3 package, will output
> from about 5 to a little over 30 VDC, very good
> regulation, and is rated at 5 Amps; i love 'em.
> on the order of $5 each.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:07 -0700, Josh Myer wrote:
> > 7812s are pretty standard for this sort of thing, and you can get them
> > in beefy TO-2s, which take the silverpaste real good and have two
> > places to bolt them to a big heatsink.
> >
> >
> > That said, it's worth thinking through what jonfoote mentions about
> > the Carnot cycle.  That is: if you use linear regulators, you're
> > dumping half of your input power as heat right there, then dumping 90%
> > of what gets through as heat off the peltier device.
> >
> >
> > The exact math there is left an exercise for the reader.
> >
> >
> > (Hint: leave room in your enclosure for a little muffin tin, and
> > consider making some DIY versions of these:
> > http://www.amazon.com/Easy-Bake-Super-Pack-mixes/dp/B00005C32X )
> > --
> > /jbm
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Corey McGuire <coreyfro at coreyfro.com>
> > wrote:
> >         http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=527 times 18?  That sounds like a bit much.  Maybe there's a better regulator.
> >
> >
> >
> >         On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Corey McGuire
> >         <coreyfro at coreyfro.com> wrote:
> >                 This is the best back-of-napkin application I've seen
> >                 for TEJ's, ever and a 24v power supply is the perfect
> >                 supply for it.
> >
> >                 There are two problems I see:
> >                      1. When you cycle them to maintain a temperature,
> >                         the heat you moved to one side will quickly
> >                         conduct back to the other.
> >                      2. In this process, a charge will be created and
> >                         sent down the wire.
> >                 How you handle this is a mystery to me.
> >
> >                 Here's what I would do.  I would NOT wire them in
> >                 series.  Instead, I would implement switching power
> >                 supplies and use them to keep the TEJ's active at 16v
> >                 when cooling or a lower voltage while maintaining the
> >                 desired temperature.  Then I would switch them
> >                 relative to how far below the desired temperature they
> >                 are.  Any temp above desired, 16v; 1 degree below,
> >                 12v; 3 degrees below, 8v... or whatever.
> >
> >                 I would NOT overdrive them because I imagine they just
> >                 get even LESS efficient.
> >
> >                 1 arduino
> >                 1 temperature probe
> >                 a fist full of switching power supplies
> >                 a capacitor just to keep power going to the TEJ to
> >                 help resist the heat moving backward (I don't know if
> >                 this is a problem, but it is a cheap solution.)
> >                 whatever else (I am not even pretending to be an EE.)
> >
> >                 YMMV
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                 On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Sean Cusack
> >                 <sean.p.cusack at gmail.com> wrote:
> >                         Oh yes...I know they are terrible at
> >                         efficiency...but they are also the only thing
> >                         that I know of that can get you to sub-ambient
> >                         temperatures without using a (comparatively)
> >                         giant refrigeration system.
> >
> >                         I'm planning on using these to cool a few
> >                         pieces of lab equipment. Typically, to get to
> >                         sub ambient conditions, you have to use
> >                         ice/water (gets you to 0C), or dry ice/acetone
> >                         (gets you to -78C), or full on Liquid N2 which
> >                         gets you too cold for most practical
> >                         applications. It would be *awesome* to hit
> >                         like -20 or -10 or even 5C repeatedly and
> >                         controllably for a million and one different
> >                         chemical reactions.
> >
> >                         There is equipment that allows you to do this
> >                         now, but pretty much its a standalone
> >                         refrigeration system that pumps cooled silicon
> >                         based oil through your reaction mixture. It
> >                         takes up a ton of room on my bench, and since
> >                         those refrigerators are on the order of $7k a
> >                         pop, its tough to convince my boss to allow me
> >                         to buy more than about 2 of them. In other
> >                         words, longer hours for Sean in the lab = teh
> >                         sux.
> >
> >                         So, I'm trying to use these doodads as a way
> >                         to run a bunch of reactions at a controllably
> >                         cold temperature. I agree there's problems,
> >                         but given the application, it may just work!
> >
> >                         Sean
> >
> >
> >
> >                         On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Foote
> >                         <jtfoote at ieee.org> wrote:
> >                                 On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Corey
> >                                 McGuire <coreyfro at coreyfro.com> wrote:
> >
> >                                 > Messy, messy stuff.  TEJ's are not
> >                                 efficient.  This is fine by
> >                                 themselves.  When you stage them,
> >                                 their inefficiencies > become readily
> >                                 apparent as they begin to compound.
> >                                 >
> >                                 > May I ask what you intend to do with
> >                                 them?
> >
> >
> >                                 Yeah, also curious. Corey is
> >                                 absolutely right: TEJs have terrible
> >                                 Carnot efficiency --  way less than
> >                                 10%. This means to move (not
> >                                 remove) 5 watts of heat you have to
> >                                 put in 50+ watts of power, which
> >                                 turns into heat you ALSO need to
> >                                 remove.
> >
> >                                 So they are only useful in a few
> >                                 applications where the small temp
> >                                 difference over a tiny scale is worth
> >                                 the waste. If they really were
> >                                 the magic refrigerators people think
> >                                 they are, they would be in every
> >                                 PC and laptop. And note that if you
> >                                 are trying to keep things cool,
> >                                 there may be far better solutions.
> >
> >                                 "In this house we obey the laws of
> >                                 thermodynamics!"
> >
> >                                 -J
> >
> >                                 _______________________________________________
> >                                 Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >                                 Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >                                 https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                         _______________________________________________
> >                         Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >                         Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >                         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >         Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Josh Myer 650.248.3796
> > josh at joshisanerd.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Josh Myer 650.248.3796
> josh at joshisanerd.com
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list