[Noisebridge-discuss] Loudspeaker SPL calculation
jim
jim at well.com
Fri Jul 30 00:43:35 UTC 2010
i don't know either. i've interspersed my "understanding"
and hope for clarification. nice write-up, by the way.
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:31 -0700, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> I feel a little silly, because I'm sure the answer is simple and I'm
> just blind to it.
>
>
>
> Master Handbook of Acoustics, 5th Edition, Everest and Pohlmann.
> --------------------
> Example 2:
>
> Assume point source and free field, so we know inverse square law applies.
js: "point source" == one speaker in a closed back cab
js: "free field" == something like the cab is hanging by
a thread 50 meters above flat ground that spreads out
for a km or so, or maybe it's hanging above the tip
of a pointy mountain top.
>
> An input of 1 W produces SPL of 115 dB at 1 m. What is the SPL at 6.1 m?
JS: i'm assuming 1W at 1m is a matter of unity-ing out the
baseline, i.e. all existing hard-won formulas have
been written wrt meters and Watts.
>
> Answer: SPL = 115 - 20 log 6.1/1
> ------------------------
> I think I understand intuitively that the ratio of the distances,
> squared (hence the 20 in front of the log), represents the difference in
> pressure, but I don't understand how they got here. Or why they subtract
> from 115 to get the answer.
JS: mainly i'm developing a headache, but subtracting
from 115 is because 115 is the SPL where other parms
are at unity and subtracting is what you do if distance
is greater than unity (while adding is what you do if
distance is less than unity) and the thing you subtract
is the (20 log(distance_in_meters)/1(SOME_UNIT)) because
that's the formula.
SO what are the measurement units of 6.1 and 1 (the
denominator)? seems something to do with
Watts = ((SPL_thingies)(meters))
(Watts/meters) = SPL_thingies
TROUBLE: watts is energy per time_unit; how to express
energy? joules? BTUs? pounds? and what happens when one
divides joules, say, by meters?
JS: the headache's getting worse. i need a snack.
>
> I do understand that the the exact relationship doesn't matter. What
> matters is how the pressure changes as we change distance.
>
> We know that SPL = 20 log (pressure/(reference pressure, 20 uPa))
>
> I could solve the above for the pressure at 1 m, since we know the SPL
> is 115, and then calculate the pressure drop when we move to 6.1 m
> (inverse square for intensity is inverse distance for pressure, so the
> pressure drops to 1/6.1 of the original) but I don't think that's what
> they are doing.
>
> How did they avoid doing the tedious calculation I see?
>
> Michael
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list