[Noisebridge-discuss] Should the NB board take action wrt IRC?

[Zedd Epstein]

I'd like to see this happen.

Zedd

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Rachel McConnell <rachel at xtreme.com> wrote:

> The board could do this.  Should we?  I won't agree to it unless we have
> a general membership consensus in favor of it; the most difficult bit, I
> think, is to decide who the new channel owners should be.  Let's take
> that in two parts.
>
> IF YOU ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT IRC:
>
> 1. should the board request this from Freenode?
>
> 2. let's wait on *who* until we know if there's consensus on *whether*.
>
> If you don't care about IRC, feel free to suppress this thread entirely.
>
> Rachel
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > On 3/26/10 1:19 PM, Ani Niow wrote:
> >> It seems like you know a bit more about the processes with Freenode
> >> than I do, would you have any suggestions beyond what you've said
> >> already to help secure the channel with owners that actually care
> >> about it?
> >
> > Yes.  The NB board should write an official letter to the Freenode
> > board, in which they:
> > a) identify themselves
> > b) identify 3 individuals to be channel owners
> > c) explain the current #noisebridge channel situation and Jake's absence
> > d) request that the #noisebridge channel be assigned to these 3 people
> > and registered as an official channel
> >
> > Given that Freenode is an overworked non-profit, I would also suggest
> > that we make a small donation (like $40 or $50) towards its maintenance
> > since we'll be using *their* time.
> >
> > Also, note that the matter will probably wait until the next Freenode
> > monthly board meeting to resolve.  There's been too many issues over
> > channel hijacking for them to risk rushing a resolution.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100326/30d474e0/attachment-0003.html>