[Noisebridge-discuss] So, how many people live at noisebridge now?

[Meredith Scheff]

Here here!

Drawing and making

On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:23 PM, rachel lyra hospodar <rachel at mediumreality.com 
 > wrote:

> here, let me be more explicit and less verbose about my proposed  
> solutions:
>
> short term:
> -get rid of the nap futon in the corner by the west fire escape
> -encourage general membership to aim towards a more work-oriented  
> atmosphere
>
> long term:
> -work towards making the space appear more like a professional  
> workspace
> and less like a college dorm lounge for hackerz. (while maintaining  
> our
> signature welcoming and offbeat atmosphere)
>
> these of course would go hand in hand with whatever direct  
> communication
> anyone would like to do with anyone else about
> nappers/crashers/squatters/undesirables.  i wouldn't presume to tell
> anyone how to communicate, or with whom.  i will make my opinions on
> this available on an individual basis for anyone who wants them.
>
> If anyone wants to help me put that nap-nasty futon on the street i  
> will
> be happy to collaborate on that project.
>
> R.
>
> On 10/21/2010 4:22 PM, meredith scheff wrote:
>> did we just agree to continue to do nothing? I'm sure that will  
>> _totally_
>> solve the problem.
>> (/sarcasm).
>> Where is it on the wiki?
>> m
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Ari Braginsky <contact at aribraginsky.com 
>> >wrote:
>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy
>>> --
>>> Ari Braginsky
>>> Game developer / Flash, iPhone, .Net, and Web 2.0 Engineer
>>>
>>> contact at aribraginsky.com
>>> aribraginsky.com
>>> blog.aribraginsky.com
>>> twitter.com/lemonkey <http://twitter.com/lemonkey>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Anselm Hook <anselm at gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Pretty much everything we do is on a case-by-case basis and it  
>>>>> lets us
>>>>> not have Rules, which then we'd have to enforce, even if it  
>>>>> didn't make
>>>>> sense to do so.  I'm all for case-by-case bases.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I like this statement in general. If our whole civilization could  
>>>> practice
>>>> mindfulness we could probably avoid a lot of the horrible things  
>>>> that happen
>>>> to people when they fall between the cracks.
>>>>
>>>> Admittedly - dealing with a situation on its own terms, taking  
>>>> the time to
>>>> look at all the factors, weighing the best possible outcomes is  
>>>> hugely time
>>>> consuming. The problem we face as humans is limited time, energy  
>>>> and
>>>> cognitive resources to fully solve all the challenges we face -  
>>>> although
>>>> given sufficient time we could produce better outcomes for any  
>>>> one of those
>>>> challenges than any hard rule. As well of course the universe is so
>>>> blisteringly complicated and outcomes so perverse that the side  
>>>> effects of
>>>> any action we take almost always dominate over the intended  
>>>> consequences.
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless I am still in favor of at least trying to be mindful  
>>>> and
>>>> avoiding the fall to rule. It is good practice. And while the  
>>>> discussion may
>>>> be raucous- the alternatives are often worse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>