[Noisebridge-discuss] DMCA Takedown / Complaint

Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Sat Oct 30 16:23:40 UTC 2010


It's considered tacky by some to run bittorent over tor...

that of course can be knocked down by some selective port filtering
which of course leaves that tor node more readilly available to serve
higger priority traffic than bulk file transfers.

joel

On 10/26/10 5:25 PM, aestetix aestetix wrote:
> Interesting points. Has PS:One in Chicago run into any issues like this?
> 
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Sai <noisebridge at saizai.com
> <mailto:noisebridge at saizai.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Don't we have a tor node running on the same IP?
> 
>     The standard "lolwut, an IP is not a person and you can only sue
>     specific people, kthxbye" (in polite legalese of course) response
>     seems appropriate here.
> 
>     If, indeed, it ever goes past this... which it probably wouldn't. I
>     got lots of DMCAs through Sonic (running an open tor node). They
>     always forwarded 'em to me, having told the lawyers that without a
>     subpoena they could fuck off. Which is a major plus IMO to Sonic for
>     customer friendly service/policies. :-)
> 
>     I'd hope that Monkeybrains would have the same policy of not releasing
>     info when they're not actually forced to. It's unlikely that
>     MediaSentry (or whoever) would bother actually getting a subpoena for
>     customer info, let alone being able to pin it on anyone particular.
> 
>     But just in terms of being nice to bandwidth, NB probably isn't good
>     for torrenting.
> 
>     - Sai
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list