[Noisebridge-discuss] okay, so no lockers. just forget it.
jacob at appelbaum.net
Thu Feb 17 19:34:05 UTC 2011
On 02/17/2011 09:38 AM, Moxie Marlinspike wrote:
> On 02/17/2011 05:19 AM, Patrick Keys wrote:
>> Here's my tally based on comments on the thread:
>> unopposed to lockers (6): jim, rachel m., john e, L E, sean, patrick
>> opposed to lockers (6): rubin, jake, claudia, leif, snail, meredith
> Hey Patrick, I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to suggest here,
> but I think you might be missing a key concept if you think that this
> kind of quantification is at all significant. Not to mention that it
> certainly has a tone of the lines being drawn. Consensus is not the
> same as unanimous voting, and if you only conceptualize people in
> categories like "for" or "against," I think you're going to have trouble
> making group decisions.
> If this is an attempt to describe the present situation for future
> reflection, I think it would serve you much more effectively to
> enumerate the various concerns that people contributed to this
> discussion, so that in the future someone can come up with a solution
> that meets everyone's needs.
> This is not to mention that some number of people likely did not
> contribute to this thread (myself included), because they saw their
> concerns/interests adequately covered by comments others had already
> made, and decided not to repeat them merely for the purpose of seeing
> ourselves type.
> - moxie
Thank you Moxie.
This email is awesome. Everyone at Noisebridge, myself included, will
benefit from this advice and understanding.
All the best,
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss