[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus item for next week - Member- & Guest- Only Hours
aestetix at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 20:37:18 UTC 2011
Three clarifying questions:
What problems with Noisebridge do you see that you're trying to solve?
How would this serve to solve those problems, what other solutions have you
tried, why did they fail, and why would this work where they have failed?
What do you see as Noisebridge's mission in general, and how does this
proposal fall within it?
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
> How big of an impact would this new rule have? How many non-members
> make use of the space after midnight when there aren't members around?
> (And how many non-members are just hanging out during that time?) My
> impression from being at the space late at night/in the morning in the
> past few weeks was that the former not only outnumber the later but
> heavily outnumber them. There is a cost to having this rule, but I
> think it is outweighed by the benefit. But if my impression is
> actually wrong, then I'd withdraw this consensus item myself.
> How about we also hold off enforcing this rule for the first couple of
> months after it is approved, to give time for nonmembers to become
> Or how about instead of just members and their guests, we also allow
> people who are completely new to the space to be there late at night
> for their first month? This kind of makes the rule more complicated,
> but how can we simplify it?
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net> wrote:
> > I block any new rules that take away access to non-members of which they
> > already have. Sorry.
> > --
> > Rubin Abdi
> > rubin at starset.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss