[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus item for next week - Member- & Guest- Only Hours

Al Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 02:44:10 UTC 2011

I think any proposed solution should be judged on its merit, whether it
comes from an individual or a group. I don't see how a solution that is
proposed by an internal member and put up for public debate and compromise
can possibly be seen as anything like an external imposition.
On Jul 14, 2011 4:40 PM, "rachel lyra hospodar" <rachelyra at gmail.com> wrote:
> I continue to believe that effective solutions to this problem will be
> generated by groups working together, as that collectivist problem-solving
> approach is fundamental to our nature. I believe that any solution
> developed and proposed by an individual will seem like it is being imposed
> externally and thus meet resistance.
> R.
> mediumreality.com
> On Jul 14, 2011 2:19 PM, "Al Sweigart" <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I should get a new perspective on this, it sounds like things have
>> changed. I'll check out the space late at night/early morning a few
>> more times. I'd still like to bring this (or probably something else)
>> to fix this problem if it becomes a problem again, but I'll table it
>> for now.
>> -Al
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Michael C. Toren <mct at toren.net> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:26:20PM -0700, Al Sweigart wrote:
>>>> How big of an impact would this new rule have? How many non-members
>>>> make use of the space after midnight when there aren't members around?
>>> I left the space last night at 2am, and there were a large number of
>>> non-members there doing excellent things -- including improving the
>>> space itself.
>>> As I said during the meeting on Tuesday, I really think the space has
>>> been pretty awesome at night recently.
>>>> Or how about instead of just members and their guests, we also allow
>>>> people who are completely new to the space to be there late at night
>>>> for their first month? This kind of makes the rule more complicated,
>>>> but how can we simplify it?
>>> I'm going to simplify it by blocking it. :-)
>>> I completely agree with Rubin on this point.
>>> -mct
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20110714/25dbbe55/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list